Compare

Revision Options Compared

A structured educational comparison of revisional procedures commonly discussed after sleeve gastrectomy. Suitability is always individual — this page does not recommend a specific procedure.

Re-sleeve gastrectomy

Potential benefits

Restores restriction in patients with a dilated sleeve; preserves a sleeve-type anatomy; typically lower nutritional impact than a malabsorptive conversion.

Considerations and risks

Staple-line risk on previously operated tissue; does not address reflux; may not be appropriate when GERD is a primary concern.

Candidacy

Selected patients with a clearly dilated sleeve, no significant reflux, and no severe metabolic disease requiring more aggressive intervention.

Mini gastric bypass (OAGB)

Potential benefits

Single anastomosis with a long, narrow gastric tube; strong metabolic effect; often substantial additional weight loss.

Considerations and risks

Bile reflux is a known consideration; nutritional follow-up is essential; not appropriate for every anatomy.

Candidacy

Selected patients seeking a strong metabolic and weight-loss effect who can commit to long-term follow-up and supplementation.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Potential benefits

Established conversion for sleeve patients with significant reflux; meaningful metabolic effect; long published track record.

Considerations and risks

Two anastomoses; risk of internal hernia, marginal ulcer, and dumping; requires lifelong supplementation and follow-up.

Candidacy

Patients with severe reflux after sleeve, regain with metabolic concerns, or anatomic reasons favoring RYGB.

Sleeve Rescue Plus

Potential benefits

A program-defined approach combining sleeve revision with additional measures to address regain or inadequate loss.

Considerations and risks

As with any revision, complexity and risk depend on prior anatomy and individual factors.

Candidacy

Patients evaluated as suitable for sleeve-based revision within the program's specific criteria.

Diabetes Magna Plus

Potential benefits

A program-defined metabolic procedure designed to maximize diabetes remission potential in selected revision candidates.

Considerations and risks

Higher metabolic and nutritional complexity; requires committed long-term follow-up.

Candidacy

Patients with type 2 diabetes recurrence or persistent metabolic disease meeting program-specific criteria.

Important limitations

Comparison categories are intentionally general. Determining the appropriate option requires individual evaluation including imaging, endoscopy, laboratory studies, and review of medical history.

Personalized evaluation

Request Personalized Evaluation